History/Archaeology News (General)
#121
Posted 14 November 2007 - 02:24 AM
#122
Posted 14 November 2007 - 05:23 AM
"... you speak of Venarium familiarly. Perhaps you were there?"
"I was," grunted [Conan]. "I was one of the horde that swarmed over the hills. I hadn't yet seen fifteen snows, but already my name was repeated about the council fires." - "Beyond the Black River", by Robert E. Howard
Read my Conan screenplays at The Scrolls of Ironhand (in particular my transcription of THE FROST GIANT'S DAUGHTER in Act II of "The Snow Devil") at
http://www.scrollsof...d.us/index.html or at
http://www.delicious...ic=ConanProject
#123
Posted 14 November 2007 - 06:28 AM
#124
Posted 14 November 2007 - 07:07 AM
This is not always the case as the first pyramids were very poor technicaly ( one or two crumbled during or some time after the construction). But it is as all things, once you get to the zenith things start to fall.
A Code of Laws are indication of civilization? ancient Egypt is no doubt a civilization but no code of laws are known or were ever mentioned by ancient egyptian sources, contrary to the babylonians, greeks, romans...
Labor Specialization was very common in the majority of Neolithic cultures, but is this civilization? So what is civilization and what is NOT civilization? I think it is very hard to define.
Vinca culture is a civilization, ok. But what about the Zulu, Gauls, Germanic Tribes, Huns, Mongols: Iron, Labor Specialization, Military Organization, Nobility, Kingship, Social Classes.
If more sophisticated and technological advenced cultures than the Vinca are "Barbarians"... I don't get it lol. Maybe there "Barbarian Civilizations"...actually there are!
But again...what is civilization?
Code of Laws? - Egyptian didn't have them
Writing? - Inca didn't have it
Labor Specialization? - Neolythic cultures (pre-civilized) already had them
Cities? - Its hard to define a "City". In Egypt "cities" was much different from the Greek "Polis" or the Roman "Urbs" or the "Cities" in Gaul. It seems a very relative word. Is a huge village a City?
Sedentarism? - it isn't Civilization per se, you can be sedentary in Amazonia or the jungles of Congo.
No Existence of Tribes? - In Arab civilization, even today, the tribe still has power, Rome had tribes and clans, ancient kingdom of Israel had tribes, etc.
Decandence? - lol no man needs to be civilized to be decadent. I think that in the Hyborian Age, there is so much decadence in civilization because they are Decadent Civilizations, they are Falling ( not militarly, it seems).
I'm starting to think that there is no much point trying to separate civilization from barbarism as "barbarian" is a relative word. Persians were as much civilized (if not more..whatever it means) as the Greeks, but they were called barbarians
So Gauls had their civilization, Picts had theirs, Megalithic Cultures in the stone age were also civilizations, as were the Aztecs, Mongols, Zulu... unless there is a solid defenition of Civilization.
#125
Posted 14 November 2007 - 06:27 PM
#126
Posted 14 November 2007 - 07:00 PM
Hmm, I thought I was the only one who still used the archaic way of spelling "archaeology."
Ain't nothing archaic about it--most British universities have departments of archaeology, and most American anthropology departments
offer courses in archaeology. A few offer courses in archeology too. And the federal government's job listings go under both.
best, MEH
#127
Posted 14 November 2007 - 07:38 PM
IMHO, part of the evidence for civilization is the presence of specialists who didn't grow or hunt their own food, but worked full-time, building and working in copper smelters full-time. The copper smelters directly require organization, and imply organized agriculture to support the specialist workers.
Well, the venerable V. Gordon Childe saw copper and iron smelting and workign as a specialist activity and it pretty much plays out
that way in the Near East. Problem is, as Michael Rowlands in a WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY article demonstrated, copper and bronze and iron
production doesn't require full-time specialists in a lot of societies. It can be a seasonal activity done when fields are fallow or when crops are growing
just before harvest.
In the case of the Vinca, from what I remember from my coursework with Tringham years ago, there isn't a massive amount of
metalwork being produced and most of the forms are very simple--nothing as elaborate as what one sees in the archaeological
record from say the Late Bronze Age. Also, there aren't a lot of maetal artifacts and most of them go towards prestige good items or
ritual items. Their mining shafts from what Jovanovic has found are shallow--nothing as complex as what occurs in the Alps in the Middle
Bronze Age. Or for that matter, nothing as deep or complex as what is found at Timna in Israel or the Wadi-Fennan in Jordan--which are just as
early and were in use for a much longer period.
Best, MEH
#128
Posted 21 November 2007 - 02:20 PM
i saw this during my web surfing and thought it might interest a few of you on here
#129
Posted 21 November 2007 - 02:22 PM
Is but a dream within a dream. - Edgar Allen Poe
It's the olden lure, it's the golden lure, it's the lure of the timeless things. - Robert Service
For the myth is the foundation of life; it is the timeless schema, the pious formula into which life flows when it reproduces its traits out of the unconscious. - Thomas Mann
Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. - Norman Maclean
#130
Posted 21 November 2007 - 04:38 PM
#131
Posted 21 November 2007 - 06:05 PM
I guess its just where the Romans thought the legend took place. It's great that discoveries like this are still being made. The beeb has some pictures taken inside:How can someone prove that the cave is the one from the legend?

#132
Posted 21 November 2007 - 06:36 PM
How can someone prove that the cave is the one from the legend?
According to the article it was always said to be there. Because other homes and palaces were built on the site historians assumed it was just a story. Simply put, no one bothered to look and it was only found now by accident. That is, unfortunately, the way some of our best discoveries are found.
Rick
#133
Posted 23 November 2007 - 08:25 PM
Is but a dream within a dream. - Edgar Allen Poe
It's the olden lure, it's the golden lure, it's the lure of the timeless things. - Robert Service
For the myth is the foundation of life; it is the timeless schema, the pious formula into which life flows when it reproduces its traits out of the unconscious. - Thomas Mann
Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. - Norman Maclean
#134
Posted 23 November 2007 - 08:32 PM
Support the Robert E. Howard Foundation. It helps you and Robert E. Howard's legacy.
#135
Posted 01 December 2007 - 05:51 AM
Settled communities with nice pots, pretty jewelry, miniskirts and copper implements don't constitute "civilization." (Okay, the miniskirts are a strong argument for.) It may constitute a local culture, but you might as well say the Cimmerians were civilized. I'd have to see evidence for a great deal more organization, more settlements with a shared culture and traditions, laws, and, yeah, the ability to wage war on an organized rather than a heroic basis.
If they were making pottery, metal implements, jewelry, and clothing, that indicates that they had to be settled into communities at least semi-permanently, and that made them far more civilized than those people that were still nomadic. Civilization isn't an either-or condition; there are degrees of civilization throughout the human race, past and present. And things like laws, codes, and traditions don't have to be written in order to be effective. For the majority of human history, people had to memorize everything--laws, myths, campfire stories, songs, etc.--since they had no method for storing information.
#136
Posted 01 December 2007 - 06:29 PM
#137
Posted 03 January 2008 - 02:16 AM
http://www.independe...ewsitemid=62457
Support the Robert E. Howard Foundation. It helps you and Robert E. Howard's legacy.
#138
Posted 03 January 2008 - 06:00 AM
It always amuses me when scholars declare unequivocally that something didn't happen, such as ". . . the Egyptians did not penetrate this desert any further than . . . about 80 kilometres south west of the Dakhla Oasis." I don't recall who said it, but I've always been partial to the phrase absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Good article, Deuce!
Best,
Scott
#139
Posted 03 January 2008 - 06:30 AM
Support the Robert E. Howard Foundation. It helps you and Robert E. Howard's legacy.
#140
Posted 03 January 2008 - 04:54 PM
It reminds of an article I read about a roman Villa in northern Spain, from the III or IV century. In this Villa archaeologist found the oldest representation of the Passion of the Christ ( I actualy seen the photos) and the "Holy Father" writen in Hieroglyphs. This could prove two things
1- The Cross representation was used at least from the III century ( one of the most hardest time to be a christian because of the roman persecutions)
2- Hieroglyphs were used at least untill III century.
One interpretation of the discovery is that a slave from Egypt was teaching those romans about christ and ancient egyptian writing.
The first thing archaeologist did when they found it was calling the press and the bishop (that blessed the pottery in which were engraved the hyeroglyphs and the cross)
Maybe they were too quick to judge or was the press ( wanting to sell news), but we are still waiting for more results on the investigation...









