Discuss the Upcoming Conan Film
#5501
Posted 11 May 2011 - 03:35 PM
#5502
Posted 11 May 2011 - 03:44 PM
I'm wondering how the film is going to convey this. As a montage? That would be a prime opportunity to throw REH fans a bone or two.
It would be simultaneously awesome and depressing to see scenes from actual Robert E. Howard stories in a Conan film rendered as... a montage. Fighting the spider from "The Tower of the Elephant." Attacking Stygian ships with the Black Corsairs in "Queen of the Black Coast." Wrestling with Thak in "Rogues in the House." Slaying the Ice-Giants from "The Frost-Giant's Daughter." Scaling the walls of Aztrias Petanius' temple in "The God in the Bowl." All on screen, yet only Howard fans would truly get the impact from them. Talk about bittersweet.
Robert E. Howard, 1906 - 2006
Sword & Sorcery!
Historical Fiction!
Horror!
Westerns!
Boxing!
Conan!
#5503
Posted 11 May 2011 - 04:49 PM
i was wondering the same. im thinking it will be a montage with a narration voice over it.
I'm wondering how the film is going to convey this. As a montage? That would be a prime opportunity to throw REH fans a bone or two.
It would be simultaneously awesome and depressing to see scenes from actual Robert E. Howard stories in a Conan film rendered as... a montage. Fighting the spider from "The Tower of the Elephant." Attacking Stygian ships with the Black Corsairs in "Queen of the Black Coast." Wrestling with Thak in "Rogues in the House." Slaying the Ice-Giants from "The Frost-Giant's Daughter." Scaling the walls of Aztrias Petanius' temple in "The God in the Bowl." All on screen, yet only Howard fans would truly get the impact from them. Talk about bittersweet.
maybe the story starts with the girl /kingdom conan saves telling a story , give a lil back ground and then meet conan were his story insects with theres.
if momoa stays as conan for future films a montage may not be bad, then they can give us prequels of thieving and pirating or do future ones of him being king.
#5504
Posted 11 May 2011 - 04:59 PM
I for one don't mind about the actor's eye color not matching Conan's literary description. It's not a make or break deal for me. More importantly for me is Momoa's characterization -- does he capture Conan's spirit, his voice, his presence? If the actor's eyes had been naturally blue, fine, but CGI or contact lenses often look fake and can take the viewer out of the film.
Let's say Momoa nails Conan's spirit, voice and presence - wouldn't it irk you no end that he has brown and sensual eyes? It would irk me, in fact it does already.
His eyecolour is something so easily fixed that not to do so would be inexcusable.
A different eyecolour rarely takes anyone out of the film, maybe if we were taking about a huge celebrity like Will Smith or something yes, but for Momoa, a face without baggage, I doubt very much anyone would taken away from the story by him having blue eyes. If anything, it would help in singling him out as a stranger in a strange land.
Of course if they are able to convincingly change his eye color I have nothing against it and even welcome it. I just meant it wasn't a big deal to me if if they did not. The key is making it look real. The last Superman film had an actor with dark eyes wearing blue contact lenses and it looked like Superman wearing blue contact lenses -- it actually robbed the actor of some expression because, as they say, the eyes are the windows to the soul and they have a lot of natural expression and character.
If the VFX team on Conan can do a perfect job on the eyes, then more power to them. But if Conan ends up with eerie, unnatural-looking eyes, or as if he has bluish cataracts, then they should not bother because it will look just too fake.
Momoa already has light greenish colored eyes, they don't look that dark to me.
#5505
Posted 11 May 2011 - 06:56 PM
I for one don't mind about the actor's eye color not matching Conan's literary description. It's not a make or break deal for me. More importantly for me is Momoa's characterization -- does he capture Conan's spirit, his voice, his presence? If the actor's eyes had been naturally blue, fine, but CGI or contact lenses often look fake and can take the viewer out of the film.
Let's say Momoa nails Conan's spirit, voice and presence - wouldn't it irk you no end that he has brown and sensual eyes? It would irk me, in fact it does already.
His eyecolour is something so easily fixed that not to do so would be inexcusable.
A different eyecolour rarely takes anyone out of the film, maybe if we were taking about a huge celebrity like Will Smith or something yes, but for Momoa, a face without baggage, I doubt very much anyone would taken away from the story by him having blue eyes. If anything, it would help in singling him out as a stranger in a strange land.
Momoa already has light greenish colored eyes, they don't look that dark to me.
My feeling is mutual.
#5506
Posted 11 May 2011 - 07:01 PM
I'm wondering how the film is going to convey this. As a montage? That would be a prime opportunity to throw REH fans a bone or two.
It would be simultaneously awesome and depressing to see scenes from actual Robert E. Howard stories in a Conan film rendered as... a montage. Fighting the spider from "The Tower of the Elephant." Attacking Stygian ships with the Black Corsairs in "Queen of the Black Coast." Wrestling with Thak in "Rogues in the House." Slaying the Ice-Giants from "The Frost-Giant's Daughter." Scaling the walls of Aztrias Petanius' temple in "The God in the Bowl." All on screen, yet only Howard fans would truly get the impact from them. Talk about bittersweet.
I would like to see Conan fight the boar-like creature(or a similar looking one) from "The Snout In The Dark". I know it's not an entirely Howard-written story, but I've always found that monster's appearence much to my liking for some reason.
#5507
Posted 11 May 2011 - 07:20 PM
Edited by Libaax, 11 May 2011 - 07:20 PM.
#5510
Posted 11 May 2011 - 08:20 PM
Bravo Stefane
! A sad, da se pridruzim i ja!
SCREAM FOR ME REH FORUM!! We want Conan with blue eyes! We want Conan with blue eyes! We want Conan with blue eyes!......
#5511
Posted 11 May 2011 - 08:52 PM
"Here's to brother Painbrush, we drink to his Shade..."
"All Art Is Martial"- RZA
"Our basic purist premise:
ROBERT E. HOWARD, ENTIRELY ALONE, WITHOUT ASSISTANCE FROM ANY OTHER PERSON, CREATED THE CHARACTER CONAN OF CIMMERIA. NO OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS SHOULD BE INTRUDING THEIR WORK INTO THE VOLUMES OF HOWARD'S CONAN STORIES.
In essence, we believe that the work of any creative artist -- writer, painter, illustrator, musician, what-have-you -- is a unique expression of an artistic point of view. It should not be appropriated or altered by others without the artist's consent. No other writer has Robert E. Howard's unique point of view, and no other writer knows what Howard would have done with his character had he lived. Upon his death, his canon, the expression of his artistic vision, became fixed. Tampering with it now is desecration."
#5512
Posted 11 May 2011 - 09:19 PM
#5513
Posted 11 May 2011 - 10:32 PM
Clash of the Scorpion King.
Edited by Eli, 11 May 2011 - 10:32 PM.
#5514
Posted 11 May 2011 - 11:29 PM
Clash of the Scorpion King.
I don't understand your criticism (assuming its meant to be a criticism). Care to eloborate?

Money and muscle, that's what I want; to be able to do any damned thing I want and get away with it. Money won't do that altogether, because if a man is a weakling, all the money in the world won't enable him to soak an enemy himself; on the other hand, unless he has money he may not be able to get away with it.
--Robert E. Howard to Harold Preece, ca. June 1928--
#5515
Posted 12 May 2011 - 12:50 AM
I'm wondering how the film is going to convey this. As a montage? That would be a prime opportunity to throw REH fans a bone or two.
It would be simultaneously awesome and depressing to see scenes from actual Robert E. Howard stories in a Conan film rendered as... a montage. Fighting the spider from "The Tower of the Elephant." Attacking Stygian ships with the Black Corsairs in "Queen of the Black Coast." Wrestling with Thak in "Rogues in the House." Slaying the Ice-Giants from "The Frost-Giant's Daughter." Scaling the walls of Aztrias Petanius' temple in "The God in the Bowl." All on screen, yet only Howard fans would truly get the impact from them. Talk about bittersweet.
I agree for the most part, and I would be quite upset if they poisoned the well for Queen of the Black Coast, but I'm assuming that the action in the film commences after the "thief" period, so I wouldn't mind seeing a bit of the other stuff thrown in, if only to show that these things "happened" in this universe, as opposed to a completely new timeline like in the previous film.

Money and muscle, that's what I want; to be able to do any damned thing I want and get away with it. Money won't do that altogether, because if a man is a weakling, all the money in the world won't enable him to soak an enemy himself; on the other hand, unless he has money he may not be able to get away with it.
--Robert E. Howard to Harold Preece, ca. June 1928--
#5516
Posted 12 May 2011 - 12:59 AM
nobody else is bothered that it seems like this poster is a composited image...?
why would that bother anyone?
#5517
Posted 12 May 2011 - 01:36 AM
nobody else is bothered that it seems like this poster is a composited image...?
why would that bother anyone?
because it's kind of corny? if you look at the poster, it sort of stops making sense when you actually examine it. it stops making sense, because as ronan pointed out, they flipped Momoa's layer etc etc etc.
"Here's to brother Painbrush, we drink to his Shade..."
"All Art Is Martial"- RZA
"Our basic purist premise:
ROBERT E. HOWARD, ENTIRELY ALONE, WITHOUT ASSISTANCE FROM ANY OTHER PERSON, CREATED THE CHARACTER CONAN OF CIMMERIA. NO OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS SHOULD BE INTRUDING THEIR WORK INTO THE VOLUMES OF HOWARD'S CONAN STORIES.
In essence, we believe that the work of any creative artist -- writer, painter, illustrator, musician, what-have-you -- is a unique expression of an artistic point of view. It should not be appropriated or altered by others without the artist's consent. No other writer has Robert E. Howard's unique point of view, and no other writer knows what Howard would have done with his character had he lived. Upon his death, his canon, the expression of his artistic vision, became fixed. Tampering with it now is desecration."
#5518
Posted 12 May 2011 - 02:07 AM
nobody else is bothered that it seems like this poster is a composited image...?
why would that bother anyone?
because it's kind of corny? if you look at the poster, it sort of stops making sense when you actually examine it. it stops making sense, because as ronan pointed out, they flipped Momoa's layer etc etc etc.
We have to remember that most movie posters aren't made to be examined too closely, but are just meant to catch and hopefully excite the eye of the casual moviegoer. Compared with all the other over-photoshopped crap that passes for movie posters these days, I think this one is particularly good and will help put more butts in the seats.
-It's also really refreshing to see a modern fantasy/action movie poster without the overused orange and blue color scheme.
#5519
Posted 12 May 2011 - 02:14 AM
nobody else is bothered that it seems like this poster is a composited image...?
why would that bother anyone?
because it's kind of corny? if you look at the poster, it sort of stops making sense when you actually examine it. it stops making sense, because as ronan pointed out, they flipped Momoa's layer etc etc etc.
We have to remember that most movie posters aren't made to be examined too closely, but are just meant to catch and hopefully excite the eye of the casual moviegoer. Compared with all the other over-photoshopped crap that passes for movie posters these days, I think this one is particularly good and will help put more butts in the seats.
-It's also really refreshing to see a modern fantasy/action movie poster without the overused orange and blue color scheme.
Dear lord, its the poster controversy, part deux.

Money and muscle, that's what I want; to be able to do any damned thing I want and get away with it. Money won't do that altogether, because if a man is a weakling, all the money in the world won't enable him to soak an enemy himself; on the other hand, unless he has money he may not be able to get away with it.
--Robert E. Howard to Harold Preece, ca. June 1928--
#5520
Posted 12 May 2011 - 02:15 AM
nobody else is bothered that it seems like this poster is a composited image...?
why would that bother anyone?
because it's kind of corny? if you look at the poster, it sort of stops making sense when you actually examine it. it stops making sense, because as ronan pointed out, they flipped Momoa's layer etc etc etc.
We have to remember that most movie posters aren't made to be examined too closely, but are just meant to catch and hopefully excite the eye of the casual moviegoer. Compared with all the other over-photoshopped crap that passes for movie posters these days, I think this one is particularly good and will help put more butts in the seats.
-It's also really refreshing to see a modern fantasy/action movie poster without the overused orange and blue color scheme.
i dunno kg, there's three guys who it seems like conan killed, but another guy well within the cutting arc who doesn't look like he is recoiling from a bad fart, and now it looks like there are even a couple floating detached weapons.
I guess, personally, I don't like things that seem to look good on a quick glance but then don't. it makes me feel like the creator thinks I'm a sucker whose not going to notice.
"Here's to brother Painbrush, we drink to his Shade..."
"All Art Is Martial"- RZA
"Our basic purist premise:
ROBERT E. HOWARD, ENTIRELY ALONE, WITHOUT ASSISTANCE FROM ANY OTHER PERSON, CREATED THE CHARACTER CONAN OF CIMMERIA. NO OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS SHOULD BE INTRUDING THEIR WORK INTO THE VOLUMES OF HOWARD'S CONAN STORIES.
In essence, we believe that the work of any creative artist -- writer, painter, illustrator, musician, what-have-you -- is a unique expression of an artistic point of view. It should not be appropriated or altered by others without the artist's consent. No other writer has Robert E. Howard's unique point of view, and no other writer knows what Howard would have done with his character had he lived. Upon his death, his canon, the expression of his artistic vision, became fixed. Tampering with it now is desecration."


This topic is locked









