Posted 08 February 2010 - 02:52 PM
One of the premier British movie magazines has reviewed the movie, For a non specialised quite critical movie magazine I see this as a very positive review.
"In 1928, four years before he dreamed up Conon The Barbarian, Texan pulp writer Robert E. Howard gave birth to Solomon Kane "a sombre and gloomy manof paleface and cold eyes all of it shadowed by a slouch hat", who dressed like Van Helsing, fought like Conan, and battled evil as though his very soul depended on it - which in fact it, it did.
Now some 80 years after Kane's first appearance in Weird Tales magazine, into his buckled boots steps James Purefoy, who attacks the role with the same gusto Howards hero brings to vanquishing evil. Although his native Somerset accent lends some of the script's purpler prose unitentional comedy value, Purefoy cuts a terrifically intense dash as Kane, effectively managing the transition from amoral killer to tortured soul who, like the subject of Kenny Roger's Coward of the County, finds that eschewing violence is all very well, but "sometimers you have to fight to be a man". Max Von Sydow and Pete Posthelwaitte add necessary gravitas in suporting roles, although an equally weighty actor would have been welcome in the role of villain: no amount of demonic make up or CG trickery can make Jason Flemying remotely threatening.
British writer/director Micheal J. Bassett, whose promising debut was the World War I trenches-set chiller Deathwatsh, handles the first fully fledged film adaptation of Howards Kane stories with the same level of commitment Peter Jackson brought to thr Lord Of The Rings trilogy, the darker moments of which are an obvious influence on Bassett's film. For less than the effects budget of this year's other sword 'n' sorcery adventures, Percy Jackson and Clash Of The Titans, Basset has delivered a dark-as-balls Highlander for the 21st century, played with such conviction it's hard not to swept along.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
VERDICT If weapons and wizardry get your blood up, and prefer your movies dark and brooding minus the sandles, Solomon Kane fits the bill. It may lack The Lord Of The Rings majesty, but Robert E. Howard fans will lap it up."
The movie is given 3 out of five stars which represents a good film in their ratings system
Review written by David Hughes for March 2010 Empire magazine
No link had to type this out by hand and I'm a crap typer taken me ages and apologys for any mistakes.